New Medicare Tax on “Unearned” Net Investment Income
Q-1: Who will be subject to the new taxes imposed in the health legislation?
A: A new 3.8% tax will apply to the “unearned” income of “High Income” taxpayers. Another 0.9% tax will apply to the “earned” income of many of these same individuals. Both levies are referred to as “Medicare” taxes. (For a description of the new 0.9% tax, see separate Q&A entitled “New Tax on EARNED INCOME: Wages, Salaries and Commissions.”)
Q-2: Who is a “High Income” Taxpayer?
A: Those whose tax filing status is “single” will be subject to the new unearned income taxes if they have Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) of more than $200,000. Married couples filing a joint return with AGI of more than $250,000 will also be subject to the new tax. (The AGI threshold for married filing separate returns is $125,000.)
Q-3: Are the $200,000 and $250,000 thresholds indexed for inflation?
No. Thus, over time, more individuals may become subject to this tax.
Q-4: When does the new 3.8% Medicare tax take effect?
A: The new Medicare tax on unearned income will take effect January 1, 2013.
Q-5: What is “unearned” net investment income?
A. Unearned income is the income that an individual derives from investing his/her capital. It includes capital gains, rents, dividends and interest income. It also comes from some investments in active businesses ifthe investor is not an active participant in the business.
The portion of unearned income that is subject both to income tax and the new Medicare tax is the amount of income derived from these sources, reduced by any expenses associated with earning that income. (Hence the term “net” investment income.) Thus, in the case of rents, the taxable amount would be gross rents minus all expenses (including depreciation) incurred in operating the rental property. So if gross rents were $100,000 with associated expenses of $40,000, net rents of $60,000 ($100,000 minus $40,000) would be included in Adjusted Gross Income (AGI).
Q-6: So the new tax will apply to rents from investment properties that I own?
A: Maybe. Remember that net investment income includes only net rental income. TThus, gross rents would not be subject to the tax. Rather, gross rents would be reduced (as they are under the income tax) by all allowable expenses, including depreciation, cost of repairs, property taxes and all other expenses related to the property. AGI includes net income from rent, so if your AGI is above the $200,000/$250,000 thresholds, then the rental income might be subject to the tax. For many investment real estate owners, the net rents will be the same as or similar to the amounts reported on their Schedule E, filed with their Form 1040 Income Tax Return. (For calculations, see Q-8, below. See also Q-9 through Q-12 related to capital gain from sale of principal residence, losses on sale and to vacation homes, below.)
Q-7: Does the tax apply to the yearly appreciation of an asset?
No. Capital gains are subject to this new tax only in the year when the asset is sold. The amount of the gain will be measured in the same way that it is for income tax purposes. This rule applies to real estate and all other appreciating capital assets. Net capital gains are taxable only in the year of sale.
Q-8: How is the new 3.8% Medicare tax calculated?
A: The new 3.8% Medicare tax is assessed only when Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) is more than $200,000/$250,000. (See Q-2 above.) AGI includes net income from interest, dividends, rents and capital gains, as well as earned compensation and several additional forms of income presented on a Form 1040 Income Tax Return.
The tax is NOT imposed on the total AGI, nor is it imposed solely on the investment income. Rather, the taxable amount will depend on the operation of a formula. The taxpayer will determine the LESSER of (1) net investment income OR (2) the excess of AGI over the $200,000/$250,000 AGI thresholds. Thus, if net investment income is the smaller amount, then the 3.8% tax is applied only to the net investment income amount. If the excess over the thresholds is the smaller amount, then the 3.8% tax would apply only to the excess amount.
For example, if AGI for a single individual is $275,000, then the excess over $200,000 would be $75,000 ($275,000 minus $200,000). Assume that this individual’s net investment income is $60,000. The new 3.8% tax applies to the smaller amount. In this example, $60,000 of net investment income is less than the $75,000 excess over the threshold. Thus, in this example, the 3.8% tax is applied to the $60,000.
If this single individual had AGI if $275,000 and net investment income of $90,000, then the new tax would be imposed on the smaller amount: the $75,000 of excess over $200,000.
Rules of thumb for predicting the application of this tax year to year are not readily determinable, largely because the proportion of net investment income compared to AGI will vary from year to year and from individual to individual.
Q-9: Will the $250,000/$500,000 exclusion on the sale of a principal residence continue to apply?
A: Yes. Any gain from the sale of a principal residence that is less than $250,000 (individual) or $500,000 (joint return) will continue to be excluded from the income tax. The new 3.8% tax will NOT apply to this excluded amount of the gain.
Q-10: Will the 3.8% tax apply to any part of the gain on the sale of a principal residence?
A: The new Medicare tax would apply only to any gain realized that is more than the $250K/$500K existing primary home exclusion (known as the “taxable gain”), and only if the seller has AGI above the $200K/$250K AGI thresholds.
So, for example, if the taxable gain was $30,000 and a married couple had AGI (which would include the taxable gain) of $180,000, the 3.8% tax would not apply because AGI is less than $250,000. If that same couple had AGI of $290,000, then the application of the 3.8% tax would be subject to the same formula described above. The $30,000taxable gain on the sale would be less than the $40,000 excess above $250,000 AGI, so the $30,000 gain would be subject to the new 3.8% tax.
Q-11: Is rent from a vacation home subject to the 3.8% tax? And what about the gain on sale of a vacation or rental property?
A: The application of the tax will depend on whether the vacation home has been rented out, the period for which it has been rented and whether the property is solely for the enjoyment of the owner. If the owner has rented the home out to others, then the 14-day rent exclusion will continue to apply. Thus, if the owner rents the property to others (including family members) for 14 or fewer days, there would be no net investment tax. (Note that no deductions for expenses would be available, as under current law.) If the home has been rented to others (including family members) for more than 14 days, then the rents (minus related expenses) would be considered as part of net investment income and could, depending on AGI and the calculations described above, be subject to the new tax.
If the vacation home has been used solely for personal enjoyment (i.e., there is no rental income and no associated expenses), then a gain on sale would be treated as net investment income and could be subject to the tax, depending on AGI. Similarly, if the property had generated rents, any net gain on sale could also be included in net investment income. The amount of the tax (if any) would depend on the calculation formula, above in Q-8.
Q-12: My rental property generates a net loss each year. How will those losses be factored into the new tax? And what if I have net capital losses when I sell?
A: Net losses from rents and net capital losses reduce AGI. Thus, the losses themselves would not be subject to the tax. If, after losses, AGI still exceeds the High Income thresholds, the 3.8% tax would still apply if there were any interest or dividends income. (Capital losses reduce capital gains. If losses exceed gains, no more than $3000 of capital losses may reduce other income in any year.)
Note that passive loss limitations will continue to apply to rental income and loss.
Q-13: All of my income is derived from real estate investments that I own and operate myself. Will my rents and gains be subject to the new tax?
A: No. If the ownership and operation of real estate you own is your sole occupation, then those activities are what’s called your “trade or business.” Income derived from a trade or business is not subject to the new 3.8% tax, but could be subject to the 0.9% tax on earned income.
If the owner of rental properties has a “day job,” however, real estate investments are not considered as a trade or business, but are rather considered as investments, even if they are a major source of income. Note that many Realtors engage in business activities are that are the “typical” selling, leasing and brokerage endeavors usually associated with the term “Realtor.” If they also own real estate assets as part of their own personal investment portfolio, the rents from that portfolio could become subject to the new 3.8% tax on net investment income, depending on AGI.
Q-14: Is there a real estate “sales tax” or a transfer tax in the new health care bill?
A: No. There is neither a real estate “sales tax” nor a real estate transfer tax in the bill.
Q-15: Will “High Income Filers” lose any portion of the Mortgage Interest they are allowed to deduct? A: No. The mortgage interest deduction is unchanged. No cap was imposed on any itemized deductions.
Q-16: Why is this new tax called a “Medicare tax?”
A: The revenues generated from this tax will be allocated to the Medicare Trust Fund that is part of the Social Security System. That fund is currently on shaky financial footing. The additional revenues generated from the new earned income and unearned income taxes are intended to shore up the Medicare Trust Fund.
Q-17: How will this new tax affect marginal (the highest) tax rates when it is combined with existing law and with the possible expiration of the Bush tax cuts enacted in 2001?
A: Marginal tax rates are the tax rates assessed on the “last” dollars included in taxable income. If the Bush tax cuts are allowed to expire, then the marginal rates for upper income individuals will increase, particularly for capital gains income. The chart below reflects the impact of those changes, presented based on implementation of current law effective dates.
Download the chart> (PDF: 90K)
Download this set of FAQs> (PDF: 99K)
Additional FAQs:
New Medicare Tax on EARNED INCOME: Wages, Salaries and Commissions
The Final Legislation
Need for Reform — A REALTOR® Perspective
Access to Health Insurance
Health Insurance Exchange and SHOP
Individual Mandates
Employer Mandates
If You Already Have or Provide Coverage
Plan Details
Paying for Health Reform
Filed under: Current Events, Economy, Health Insurance, Retirement, Tax Issues, VRN | No Comments »
![[Valid RSS]](http://feedvalidator.org/images/valid-rss-rogers.png "Validate my RSS feed")
Gay Equal Rights Affirmed #NAR’s board voted to prohibit members from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation.
By Stacey Moncrieff | August 2010
Eric Kodner’s Madeline Island Real Estate blog on ActiveRain is a lively mix of business and human interest stories and he used his blog to post a serious call to action. In response to some debate the previous day on ActiveRain, Kodner called for an update to the Code of Ethics of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
That posting became a key part of the chain of events leading to a historic vote at this year’s REALTORS® Midyear Legislative Meetings in Washington, D.C. On May 15, the NAR board of directors voted to add language about sexual orientation to Article 10 of the Code of Ethics. For the change to take effect, the vote must be approved by NAR’s Delegate Body, which meets Nov. 8 at the REALTORS® Conference & Expo in New Orleans.
For Kodner, the ActiveRain blog post put him squarely in the middle of an issue that was already being debated in real estate circles around the country. He received an appointment to the Wisconsin REALTORS® Association’s Equal Opportunity Committee, and it was that committee that brought a proposal forward—first to NAR’s Cultural Diversity and Equal Opportunity Committee in November 2009 and then to NAR’s Professional Standards Committee in May.
The Professional Standards Committee, in turn, teed up the board’s recent action by voting unanimously in favor of the proposal. “It was time for the association to take a stand for tolerance,” says committee chair Linda Page, GRI, SFR, a practitioner in Rhinebeck, N.Y.
If the Delegate Body passes the change, Article 10 will read:
The board of directors’ vote puts NAR one step ahead of Congress, which is considering a change to the Fair Housing Act. The Fair and Inclusive Housing Rights Act of 2010 would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. It would be the first change to the law since 1988, when handicap and familial status were added as protected classes.
“The entire process made me proud to be a REALTOR®,” says Kodner, who’s been invited to travel to Washington to meet with Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), the bill’s cosponsor. “I’ve been so impressed with the way NAR has handled this issue.”
Stacey Moncrieff is editor-in-chief of REALTOR® magazine.
Filed under: Commentary, Current Events, Politics, VRN, West Hollywood | No Comments »