FAQ’s: CONSUMER TIPS FOR WORKING DIRECTLY WITH YOUR LENDER ON A LOAN MODIFICATION

Important advice to anyone planning to contact their lender directly for a loan modification: The key here is to be tenacious. These lenders and servicers (lenders) are large with hundreds, and even thousands, of employees. Whenever you call your lender, you should plan on being on the phone for a long time (figure an hour or so). Don’t call from a cell phone or in between running errands. Treat it like an important business conversation. Have paper and a pencil available, and have your loan information ready.

When you call, you do not need to tell your entire story to the first live person you reach. That person is most likely a level 1 customer service representative, who in most cases just wants to collect from you any arrearages you have on your loan. Tell them that you are calling to request a loan modification. You need to get to the “loss mitigation,” “asset division” or “foreclosure prevention” division (or whatever that particular lender calls the place which deals with loan modifications and/or deals with distressed borrowers who need their loan modified.) A good plan is to tell the first live person that you reach that you are trying to modify your loan and ask that they direct you to the right division within the lender’s institution. Once they give you the name of that division, write it down! Ask if there is a direct number for that division. If yes, write it down! Then ask if they can transfer you to that division. Once they do, when you talk to someone in that division, just tell them you are looking to discuss a loan modification and ask if you have reached the correct division in the institution. If they say yes, then before you tell them your story, ask for their full name and return telephone number with extension (most every lender has multiple extensions, so be diplomatic. But be persistent – it will be difficult to find that same person again if you do not have their extension.) In addition, you should ask for the name and extension of their supervisor so that if you have any problems, concerns or even positive feedback, you know who you can contact. The individual with whom you are talking may not want to give you all that information, but try. And of course, be sure to write all of the information you learn down on that pad of paper because you will find yourself referring to it time and time again. Now you are finally talking to the correct person to discuss your situation (it has probably taken you 20 minutes to get there, by the way). Start explaining your situation. Be sure to listen to what they say in response, and make notes about what documentation you need to provide and where it needs to be sent and in what format, etc. At this point, you are basically stating your case and trying to get the lender to agree to modify your loan. Make certain to ask the individual what you should expect, how long it will take, how you should communicate with them in the future, etc.

The answers to the FAQs may be general in nature. To address your own situation, you should seek professional legal, real estate, and/or financial advice from a licensed and experienced person(s).

Q. What will I need to provide the lender when I request a loan modification?
A. The following is a list, not inclusive, of the typical information a lender will request. A sample Financial Information Worksheet, which may be provided to you by your lender, is provided at the end of this document. This form should assist you in gathering the typical information requested by a lender.
1) Current mortgage loan statements and the following information: Mortgage loan balance, Monthly payment amount, Current interest rate, Any delinquent payments, Amount of delinquent payments
2) Original mortgage loan documents and the following information:
Term of the loan. (30 years, 15 years, etc.), Interest rate. Is it a fixed or adjustable interest rate? Interest only payments?
Minimum or partial payments that are less than the principal and interest? Will a balloon payment be due? When? Is there a prepayment penalty on the loan?
3) Property information:
Is this your primary residence? Second home? Investment property? Purchase price? Current value? Amount of equity, if any.
Property profile? Comparable sales, active listings? Is the property currently listed for sale?
4) Income and asset information:
Paystubs, W2s, 1099s, benefit or award letters, retirement and pension benefit statements, annuity statements, proof of child support/alimony payments received, copies of tax returns, profit and loss statements if self-employed, schedules of real estate owned, stock and mutual fund portfolio statements, bank statements, proof of any other income.
5) Payment history on the mortgage loans:
Correspondence from the lender, Credit history, Hardship circumstances, if any, and proof!
6) Information about your ability to repay the loan:
Financial profile – assessment of the following: Current income, available assets, recurring expenses. Housing debt to income ratio.

Q. What mortgage payment amount can I expect to pay?
A. Compare the current payments to your income. What percent of your income is the mortgage payment? If it is more than 31%, calculate the amount that is 31% of your gross income.
Could you afford this amount along with your other debt? If so, Is the property “owner occupied,” 1 to 4 units? Is the loan amount less than $729,750? Is the current payment unaffordable due to a change in income or expenses?
Can your payment amount be lowered to the amount that is 31% of your gross income? Calculate a longer loan term (40 years)? Calculate a lower interest rate. Calculate a change from an adjustable rate to a fixed rate.
Calculate interest only payments for a short period of time.
Calculate a reduced loan balance. Do you have delinquent payments?
The lender may accept the delinquent amount in payments. The lender may add the delinquent amount to the loan balance. The lender may forebear the payment for a short period of time.

Q. What if I cannot afford a lower monthly payment?
A. The lender may allow the borrower to sell the property for less than is owed. Or the lender may accept the
deed and the keys to the property.

Q. What alternatives are there to foreclosure?
A. There are several alternatives to foreclosure. Careful consideration should be given to each as
circumstances vary and lender approval must be obtained. The following is a brief description of each:
• Forbearance/Formal Forbearance: A Forbearance Plan is a repayment agreement between you and the lender. They will review the documents supporting your monthly income and expenses. A plan will be developed and placed in writing providing for a payment of one full monthly payment and a portion of the delinquent amount due on your account. Or, it may allow for all delinquent payments and fees to be added to the end of your mortgage and you start making your payments as normal with no delinquent amounts due. The objective of the plan is to allow you to cure your default over a period of time, reinstating your mortgage, while allowing you to maintain your normal monthly living expenses.
• Modification: In certain circumstances, the investor may allow the delinquent amount to be added to the loan balance, temporarily reduce the interest rate and/or your monthly payments to assist you in curing the default and restoring your credit status. You must qualify for the modification. In other words, if your interest rate is lowered, which lowers your monthly payment, you must have sufficient income to pay your new mortgage payment and your monthly expenses.
• Short Sale/Pre-Foreclosure Sale: Frequently used by a mortgagor who, due to a change in employment or other life event, can no longer afford their home. The decision to sell your home under these circumstances is difficult; in addition, fluctuations in real estate markets may leave you in a situation where you have little or no equity or even a loss upon the sale of your home. A short sale occurs when you owe more than your home is worth. Investor approval is based upon your financial situation and the current market value of your home.
• Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure: In the event you have decided you can no longer afford your home and do not want to go through marketing efforts or foreclosure, you may voluntarily return the property to the investor/lender. Your lender would need to verify they are the only lien holder on the property and they would need to perform a walk-through inspection of the property.

For more info and a pdf form from the CA Department of Real Estate with the rest of this valuable info please click HERE.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
-1+1 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Tip of the Day: Put your car keys beside your bed at night and utilize your car alarm in case of panic

Tell your spouse, your children, your neighbors, your parents, your Dr’s office, the check-out girl at the market, everyone you run across. Put your car keys beside your bed at night.

If you hear a noise outside your home or someone trying to get in your house, just press the panic button for your car. The alarm will be set off, and the horn will continue to sound until either you turn it off or the car battery dies.

This tip came from a neighborhood watch coordinator. Next time you come home for the night and you start to put your keys away, think of this:

It’s a security alarm system that you probably already have and requires no installation. Test it.

It will go off from most everywhere inside your house and will keep honking until your battery runs down or until you reset it with the button on the key fob chain.

It works if you park in your driveway or garage. If your car alarm goes off when someone is trying to break into your house, odds are the burglar/rapist won’t stick around.

After a few seconds all the neighbors will be looking out their windows to see who is out there and sure enough the criminal won’t want that.

And remember to carry your keys while walking to your car in a parking lot. The alarm can work the same way there. This is something that should really be shared with everyone. Maybe it could save a life or a sexual abuse crime.

It would also be useful for any emergency, such as a heart attack, where you can’t reach a phone. For instance, Mom could suggest to Dad that he carry his car keys with him in case he falls outside and she doesn’t hear him. He can activate the car alarm and then she’ll know there’s a problem because its established.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
-1+1 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Preparing and Staging a House for Sale: What’s New in the NAR Virtual Library

Home staged for resale - family room, kitchen
Image via Wikipedia

Banish the clutter! Trim the bushes! Hide your Star Wars collection! Take down the family pictures! What things can you do to prepare a house for sale? Here are tips, hints, thoughts and ideas for sprucing up, cleaning out, decorating, staging, creating a great first impression and making a house appealing to buyers. (A. Siudzinski, Senior Information Specialist)


Selling your home? Get more money with these easy (and inexpensive!) design tricks, (shine.yahoo.com, Feb. 4, 2010).

How to prepare your house for sale, (homebuying.about.com, 2010).

Clutter-free helps sell homes, (Realty Times, Jan. 9, 2009).

Speed your home sale with these fast fix-ups, (MSN Money, May 4, 2009).


Styled, staged & sold, (www.realtor.org, 2010).

The Staging Pro, (REALTOR® Magazine, 2010).

Home staging strategies to remember!, (Real Estate Home Staging, Jan. 7, 2010).

Innovative home staging is the key to home sales in a down market, (RISMedia, Dec. 21, 2009).

Staging in a virtual reality, (REALTOR® Magazine, Oct. 2009).

Staging a high-end home requires a different kind of makeover, (Miami Herald , July 27, 2009).


Tips for Specific Areas of the House

Home staging tips: living room staging ideas, (Massachusetts Home Buyer Network, Jan. 8, 2010).

Staging the kitchen, (homebuying.about.com, 2010).

Staging the bedroom no less important than kitchen or bathroom for a fast house sale, (American Chronicle, Dec. 23, 2009).

Home Staging Atlanta–Living Room Before and After Pictures, (ActiveRain, Apr. 16, 2009).

Staging to make a dining room look bigger, (House Calls, Mar. 31, 2009).

5 cheapskate tips to staging your spare room, (www.ezinearticles.com, Feb. 4, 2009).


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
-1+1 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

The great peasant revolt of 2010

Contributed By Charles Krauthammer

Friday, February 5, 2010

“I am not an ideologue,” protested President Obama at a gathering with Republican House members last week. Perhaps, but he does have a tenacious commitment to a set of political convictions.

Compare his 2010 State of the Union to his first address to Congress a year earlier. The consistency is remarkable. In 2009, after passing a $787 billion (now $862 billion) stimulus package, the largest spending bill in galactic history, he unveiled a manifesto for fundamentally restructuring the commanding heights of American society — health care, education and energy.

A year later, after stunning Democratic setbacks in Virginia, New Jersey and Massachusetts, Obama gave a stay-the-course State of the Union address (a) pledging not to walk away from health-care reform, (b) seeking to turn college education increasingly into a federal entitlement, and (c) asking again for cap-and-trade energy legislation. Plus, of course, another stimulus package, this time renamed a “jobs bill.”

This being a democracy, don’t the Democrats see that clinging to this agenda will march them over a cliff? Don’t they understand Massachusetts?

Well, they understand it through a prism of two cherished axioms: (1) The people are stupid and (2) Republicans are bad. Result? The dim, led by the malicious, vote incorrectly.

Liberal expressions of disdain for the intelligence and emotional maturity of the electorate have been, post-Massachusetts, remarkably unguarded. New York Times columnist Charles Blow chided Obama for not understanding the necessity of speaking “in the plain words of plain folks,” because the people are “suspicious of complexity.” Counseled Blow: “The next time he gives a speech, someone should tap him on the ankle and say, ‘Mr. President, we’re down here.’ ”

A Time magazine blogger was even more blunt about the ankle-dwelling mob, explaining that we are “a nation of dodos” that is “too dumb to thrive.”
Obama joined the parade in the State of the Union address when, with supercilious modesty, he chided himself “for not explaining it [health care] more clearly to the American people.” The subject, he noted, was “complex.” The subject, it might also be noted, was one to which the master of complexity had devoted 29 speeches. Perhaps he did not speak slowly enough.

Then there are the emotional deficiencies of the masses. Nearly every Democratic apologist lamented the people’s anger and anxiety, a free-floating agitation that prevented them from appreciating the beneficence of the social agenda the Democrats are so determined to foist upon them.

That brings us to Part 2 of the liberal conceit: Liberals act in the public interest, while conservatives think only of power, elections, self-aggrandizement and self-interest.

It is an old liberal theme that conservative ideas, being red in tooth and claw, cannot possibly emerge from any notion of the public good. A 2002 New York Times obituary for philosopher Robert Nozick explained that the strongly libertarian implications of Nozick’s masterwork, “Anarchy, State, and Utopia,” “proved comforting to the right, which was grateful for what it embraced as philosophical justification.” The right, you see, is grateful when a bright intellectual can graft some philosophical rationalization onto its thoroughly base and self-regarding politics.

This belief in the moral hollowness of conservatism animates the current liberal mantra that Republican opposition to Obama’s social democratic agenda — which couldn’t get through even a Democratic Congress and powered major Democratic losses in New Jersey, Virginia and Massachusetts — is nothing but blind and cynical obstructionism.

By contrast, Democratic opposition to George W. Bush — from Iraq to Social Security reform — constituted dissent. And dissent, we were told at the time, including by candidate Obama, is “one of the truest expressions of patriotism.”

No more. Today, dissent from the governing orthodoxy is nihilistic malice. “They made a decision,” explained David Axelrod, “they were going to sit it out and hope that we failed, that the country failed” — a perfect expression of liberals’ conviction that their aspirations are necessarily the country’s, that their idea of the public good is the public’s, that their failure is therefore the nation’s.

Then comes Massachusetts, an election Obama himself helped nationalize, to shatter this most self-congratulatory of illusions.

For liberals, the observation that “the peasants are revolting” is a pun. For conservatives, it is cause for uncharacteristic optimism. No matter how far the ideological pendulum swings in the short term, in the end the bedrock common sense of the American people will prevail.

The ankle-dwelling populace pushes back. It recenters. It renormalizes. Even in Massachusetts.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
-1+1 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

#WeHo Rapper Guilty of 2nd Degree Murder, Cleared on Three Other Counts

David Jassy
Image via Wikipedia

By WeHo News Staff, West Hollywood, California (February 4, 2010) A jury found West Hollywood resident David Jassy, a rapper and record producer from Sweden, guilty Monday of second-degree murder in the death of John Osnes, a 55-year-old jazz pianist, in Hollywood. Mr. Jassy stood accused of attacking Mr. Osnes, a popular local pianist and pedestrian rights activist, punching him in the head, kicking him in the face and then driving over his mortally wounded body. Commentators at the time likened the affair to an incident straight from the previous year’s Oscar winner, “Crash,” a film about racial tensions and random life changing happenstances.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
-1+1 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

$14,294,000,000,000.00 is The new debt limit of the government of the United States because the House agrees to $1.9 trillion more #debt

u.s. capitol
Image by mélih via Flickr

Contributor Andrew Taylor

The House on Thursday voted to allow the government to go $1.9 trillion deeper in debt — an increase of about $6,000 more for every U.S. resident that provided a vivid election-year reminder of the nation’s perilous financial condition.

The huge debt increase, approved 217-212, is only enough to keep the government afloat for about another year as it borrows more than 40 cents of every dollar it spends on programs like defense, health care, feeding the poor and protecting the environment. The budget tops $3.7 trillion this year and the deficit’s approaching $1.6 trillion under the budget submitted by President Barack Obama this week.

The huge increase — to $14.3 trillion — in the cap on federal borrowing was designed by Democratic leaders to ensure that the rank and file won’t have to vote again to run up another increase before facing voters increasingly angry over government spending and debt in the November midterm elections.

Already, the accumulated debt amounts to roughly $40,000 per person.

“This debt is being piled on the backs of our kids and grandkids with no relief in sight,” House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, said.

Economists warn that the rapidly-rising debt could force interest rates higher and, if left unchecked, could have even worse consequences for the economy.

Passage of the bill sends it to Obama, who will sign it to avoid a first-ever, market-rattling default on U.S. obligations.

“I can’t think of a more reckless or irresponsible act. Defaulting is not an option,” said Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass. “If the United States defaults, investors will lose confidence that the U.S. will honor its debts in the future.”

Thirty-seven Democrats, mostly from GOP-leaning districts, voted against the measure. So did every Republican, even though they routinely supported prior increases in the borrowing cap when their party controlled Congress or when Republican George W. Bush was president.

Senate approval last week on a party-line tally was only possible because Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown had yet to assume office. Brown was being seated Thursday.

To help win passage, Democrats also adopted — in a 233-187 vote — budget rules designed to curb a spiraling upward annual deficit, projected by Obama to hit a record $1.56 trillion for the budget year ending Sept. 30. The new rules — known as “paygo” — would require future spending increases or tax cuts to be paid for with either cuts to other programs or equivalent tax increases.

If the rules are broken, the White House budget office would force automatic cuts to programs like Medicare, farm subsidies and unemployment insurance. Current rules lack such teeth and commonly have been waived over the past few years at a cost of about $1 trillion.

Most other benefit programs — including Medicaid, Social Security and food stamps — would be exempt from such cuts, leading Republicans to charge that the new rules are just as weak.

Obama issued a statement praising passage of the statutory pay-as-you-go rules, but skipped any mention of the debt limit increase.

“It is no coincidence that when we last had statutory paygo, during the 1990s, we turned deficits into surpluses,” Obama said. “The passage of statutory paygo today will help usher out an era of irresponsibility and begin putting the country back on a fiscally sustainable path.”

But Rep. Pete Sessions, R-Texas, said: “In place of real fiscal discipline, it offers a phony pay-as-you-go rule that is more loopholes and exceptions and does nothing to tackle our government’s long-term structural deficit.” Skeptics say lawmakers also will find ways around the new rules fairly easily. For example, Congress can declare some spending an “emergency” — a likely scenario for votes later this month to extend jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed.

There already are exceptions to the new rules, such as for extending former Bush’s middle-class tax cuts past their expiration a year from now. That would add $1.4 trillion to the federal debt over the next decade. Legislation giving doctors relief from Medicare payment cuts would also get an extended break from the rules.

But some new White House initiatives, such as doubling the child care tax credit for families earning less than $85,000, also would have to live within the rules, as would continuing subsidies for laid-off workers to buy health insurance — unless lawmakers make another exception.

And the rules also mean that two years from now, lawmakers would have to raise taxes to pay for continuing lower tax rates on large inheritances and to protect millions of middle-class taxpayers from feeling the bite of the alternative minimum tax.

“We will have the will and we will have the discipline,” House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., promised.

The so-called pay-as-you-go rules have been a mantra with conservative “Blue Dog” Democrats in the House, who insisted they wouldn’t vote to raise the debt ceiling without them.

Obama’s budget projects the government’s debt doubling to $26 trillion over the next decade. It offers few solutions for seriously closing the gap other than promising to appoint a bipartisan commission to come up with a plan to address the problem. But most Republicans aren’t stepping up as well.

___

The bill is H.J. Res. 45.

___

On the Net:

Congress: http://thomas.loc.gov

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
-1+1 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

New Books in the National Association of Realtors (NAR) Central Library (February 2010)

The library of the Nautilus.
Image via Wikipedia

What’s new in the Information Central library collection? This month you’ll find books on urbanism, real estate investment, vacation homes, remodeling and many more. Interested in borrowing any of these titles from the library? Simply click on the title to make your request right over the web!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
-1+1 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

West Hollywood #WEHO Puppy Mill Animal Retail Sale Ban Passes City Council

Humane Society of the United States
Image via Wikipedia

Feb 23, 2010. West Hollywood City Council Monday passed the ordinance prohibiting the sale of dogs and cats in pet stores. Nobody, however, expected the ordinance to pass by acclamation without debate after endorsement by the head of the national Humane Society’s D.C. office, the Mayor Pro Tem of Yucaipa (also the chief Veterinarian for Riverside County) and a South Tahoe resident who helped pass the first such ban in that city. The new ordinance prohibits the sale of all dogs and cats at companion animal stores, providing exemptions for humanely bred, reared or sheltered animals.

By the way pet owners, there are many places online with good pet health guides or online pharmacies.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
-1+1 (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...